Basically, Clutter provides a Canvas for drawing complex graphics and effects. This Canvas could be inserted inside a Gtk context, using the Clutter-Gtk library.
The second part of my post will be focused on my work during last R&D project iteration and what were my thoughts about this new and promising technology; there were several discussions in the gtk-devel list about the new GTK 3.0 evolution and what would be the role of Clutter project.
The best way to understand a technology, after read carefully all related documentation, is to implement a proof of concept. For that purpose, i’ve chosen the YouTube client applications domain to develop new UI concepts, in order to test the powerful of Clutter as toolkit.
The first thing i’ve realized when i read the Clutter project documentation is that Clutter is not actually a toolkit, as it’s mentioned in Clutter project web page. With my understanding of the toolkit concept, it should be a set of tools for implementing user interfaces. However, user interfaces are not only graphical elements, but window management, theming support, advanced graphical components, translation support, applets and icons management, shortcuts, toolbars and menus or similar ways of activating user actions, … In that sense, Clutter lacks of several important features required to be considered as UI toolkit. I think that, at least at this moment, Clutter could be just considered as a graphical engine or scene graph tool. This point was also mentioned by some people inside gtk developers community who are considering the approach of using Clutter as scene graph concept for the next GTK 3.0.
When finally i began to develop my test application i had assumed that it actually wont be a functional YouTube client application, just an user interface proof of concept. Who knows what will happen in future, but for this project i’ ve focused the development in just one use case: querying for videos and show the results. For implementing the communication with YouTube web services i’ve found a very interesting implementation of YouTube GData API: libgdata and libgdata-google.These libraries, also used inside evolution-data-server as static libraries, are also provided as independent libraries, at least, in Ubuntu hardy. These libraries, implemented using a GLib GObject approach, provide Client access to google POA through SOAP interface.
During the implementation of this YouTube client application i’ve implemented several UI for showing YouTube top_rated query results. The first approach was obviously a GtkTreeView view.
The first and simpler clutter approach would be to show results in a square grid. I have to say that the square grid its also possible to implement in Gtk, although Clutter provides more fancy effects.
After this first UI proposals, and after understanding better advanced operations with Clutter, i tried to define new ways of showing information, always thinking about how to improve the end user experience.
The most interesting questions i’ve made to myself at this point have not been about Clutter technology capabilities, but what new UI concepts we want to achieve. I think there are several graphic technologies today providing new ways of drawing user interfaces, the important point is to define precisely how to present information and services to end users in a more intuitive way.